Jump to content

Recommended Posts

How do you find the derivative of ln(2y+1)=xe^y??

You need to use implicit differentiation for this, I do HL so I know it's required for that but not sure at the other levels.

xe^y derives to: e^y + xe^y dy/dx

due to implicit differentiation and the chain rule

the derivative of ln(2y+1) = (2/(2y+1))(dy/dx)

because the derivative of ln(f(x)) = f'(x)/(f(x)

so the derived function of your function is (I rearranged it to = 0 )

0 = e^y + xe^y dy/dx - (2/(2y+1))(dy/dx)

The dy/dx is used whenever you differentiate y, so you use the chain rule.

Does that make sense? If you don't know about implicit differentiation I'm not sure it will..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest hellokitty818

How do you find the derivative of ln(2y+1)=xe^y??

You need to use implicit differentiation for this, I do HL so I know it's required for that but not sure at the other levels.

xe^y derives to: e^y + xe^y dy/dx

due to implicit differentiation and the chain rule

the derivative of ln(2y+1) = (2/(2y+1))(dy/dx)

because the derivative of ln(f(x)) = f'(x)/(f(x)

so the derived function of your function is (I rearranged it to = 0 )

0 = e^y + xe^y dy/dx - (2/(2y+1))(dy/dx)

The dy/dx is used whenever you differentiate y, so you use the chain rule.

Does that make sense? If you don't know about implicit differentiation I'm not sure it will..

it makes sense but the answer says it is e^y(2y+1)/2-xe^y(2y+1) is that the same thing sorry i have no idea....

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you find the derivative of ln(2y+1)=xe^y??

You need to use implicit differentiation for this, I do HL so I know it's required for that but not sure at the other levels.

xe^y derives to: e^y + xe^y dy/dx

due to implicit differentiation and the chain rule

the derivative of ln(2y+1) = (2/(2y+1))(dy/dx)

because the derivative of ln(f(x)) = f'(x)/(f(x)

so the derived function of your function is (I rearranged it to = 0 )

0 = e^y + xe^y dy/dx - (2/(2y+1))(dy/dx)

The dy/dx is used whenever you differentiate y, so you use the chain rule.

Does that make sense? If you don't know about implicit differentiation I'm not sure it will..

it makes sense but the answer says it is e^y(2y+1)/2-xe^y(2y+1) is that the same thing sorry i have no idea....

Try and rearrange it so that you have dy/dx = your terms, you might find that makes the answer make a bit more sense :) And check my differentiation too actually - I'm pretty brain dead atm

Link to post
Share on other sites

find the angles AOB, AOC, BOC using cos rule, then find the area of each small triangle using sin rule. last, add them up.

EDIT:

find the angles AOB, AOC, BOC in terms of x using cos rule. since the three angles add up to 360°, I guess you can then find the values of each angle. then find the area of each small triangle using sin rule. last, add them up.

Edited by Desy Glau
Link to post
Share on other sites

question guys... if you're given the graph of f'(x) and are asked to draw f(x), how do you know the y coordinate of x? I think we can only find stationary and inflexion points, right? if they ask us to draw f(x) on the same axes as its derivative, how do you know if it should be taller or shorter than the derivative? in case if my question doesn't make sense, I'm asking about the vertical stretch of the function (not how to stretch it, but how stretched it is). I had some kind of mocks today and it came out in paper 2...dammit


How do you find the derivative of ln(2y+1)=xe^y??

are you taking HL or SL? if you're taking HL, use implicit differentiation as Ziggy suggested. otherwise:

ln(2y+1)=xe^y

x=ln(2y+1)/e^y

find dx/dy from this. after that, you can find dy/dx from 1/(dx/dy).

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be really difficult, I guess you could only estimate the y-coordinates depending on the slope of a tangent at that point. Like if the derivative graph is curving upwards during an interval then your f(x) also increases.

Surely they cannot deduct marks if all the critical points are positioned correctly and the concavities are also correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be really difficult, I guess you could only estimate the y-coordinates depending on the slope of a tangent at that point. Like if the derivative graph is curving upwards during an interval then your f(x) also increases.

Surely they cannot deduct marks if all the critical points are positioned correctly and the concavities are also correct?

ahhh I see... thank you! unfortunately I left that question to do last even though I've already worked out the stationary and inflexion points and the shape on a SCRAP PAPER.... in the end I didn't manage to copy the graph in the question booklet :bawling: because I didn't realise the time was almost up :( oh well...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is supposed to be able to be solved by hand, then you can definitely still use sin cos and tan! You should know the values you can get using specific angles and their corresponding values. So if it is intended to be non-calculator, it is highly likely that it is going to be values like this because ... well just because :)

Don't try and avoid using trig! You won't get far without it, especially in paper 1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi !

My option for HL Maths is Sets, relations and groups. I'm generally fine with the questions that actually involve numbers (isn't that supposed to be what maths is!?!) but I often get very stuck on questions that are purely theoretical.

So what I'm wondering is does anyone have any tips on how to get at least a few marks on these questions? I often find it simply hard to start the questions. I like Cayley tables and all that and I mostly have all the theory down, but it's when it comes down to applying this to purely theoretical situations that I come unstuck. Help?

Btw, by theoretical I mean questions of the type:

(a) Define an isomorphism between two groups (G, * ) and (H, •).

(b) Let e and e' be the identity elements of groups G and H respectively.

Let f be an isomorphism between these two groups. Prove that f (e) = e'.

© Prove that an isomorphism maps a finite cyclic group onto another

finite cyclic group.

(Total 10 marks)

Although not necessarily this question in particular. I have mark schemes, but I just find it difficult to understand them! From what I've gathered this isn't the most common option topic, but any help would be appreciated :) Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the equation y=sqrt(25-x^2) is that of a circle centered around the origin with a radius of 5. If we rearrange the equation we get y^2+x^2=25 an equation for a circle. on a graphing calculator however it will only give positive values of y so that it is a function. so essentially, to get the real graph, you would have to graph both the positive and negative y's simultaneously. AKA: y=sqrt(25-x^2) and y=-sqrt(25-x^2)

Edited by kinguncaged1
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Bieber fan.

Derivative of y=4-x^2

is -2x which is the formula that gives slope.

and then you acquaint -2x to the line.

y=(-2x)x+5

if you want to find the tangent line, the line shares a common point with the parabola. therefore you acquaint the line and the parabola.

(-2x)x+5=-x^2+4

Solve for x.

x^2=1

x=+/- 1

going back to the derivative, the derivative is then

-2x .. and when you sub the x values, the slope(m) is either 2, or -2

Check your work.

2x+5=-x^2+4

x^2+2x+1=0

x=-1

-2x+5=-x^2+4

x^2-2x+1=0

x=1

Edited by Capt'n Marth
did the wrong question
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest hellokitty818

Why thank you for solving the problem...I do not think i would've thought of that and yes I am a huge bieber fan <3

Last problem for the night.. the line y=16x-9 is a tangent to the curve y=2x^3+ax^2+bx-9 at the point (1,7). Find the values of a and b. Please help

Edited by hellokitty818
Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically if the line y = 16x - 9 is tangent to the curve, then at the point (1,7) they have the same slope (derivative).

dy/dx = 6x^(2) + 2ax + b. Now plug the x-coordinate given into this derivative and you should get 2a + b + 6 as an expression for the slope at the given point.

Now since y = 16x - 9 is linear then the slope is always 16. So equate 2a + b + 6 = 16, therefore 2a + b = 10.

Now to find a second equation relating the unknowns simply plug in your given co-ordinates into the cubic equation.

So, 7 = 2(1) + a(1) + b(1) - 9. Therefore a + b = 14.

Now you have two equations relating your two unknowns. Solving them simultaneously should give you a = -4 and b = 18.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The easiest way to determine the points of the tangents concerning quadratic equations lies in the use of the discriminant.

You know when b^(2) - 4ac = 0 then the equation contains only a single root? Apply the same logic here.

If a line is tangent to a quadratic curve then it can meet it only once. So if you solve the equations:

3x^(2) - x + 4 = mx + 1. Rearrange and you will get 3x^(2) - (m + 1)x + 3 = 0.

Use the discriminant b^(2) - 4ac = 0 to determine the points of m which are tangent to f(x).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...