dessskris Posted November 30, 2011 Report Share Posted November 30, 2011 i have one concern ! I did everything , i even found the equaiton of the denominator, but what do i put for En®= ? En( r) asks for the function of the whole fraction so just put the equation for numerator on top of equation of denominator and you're done! Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tata123 Posted November 30, 2011 Report Share Posted November 30, 2011 because of the scope and limitations:limitiation says what it cant be but what are scopes?please help Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dessskris Posted November 30, 2011 Report Share Posted November 30, 2011 because of the scope and limitations:limitiation says what it cant be but what are scopes?please helpI take them as the same thing tbh Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien R. Posted December 3, 2011 Report Share Posted December 3, 2011 Hello there (: I wish I had found this thread earlier! I have obtained the general statement which provides me with correct answers but I just wanted to make sure : after having converted the general statement fraction with a non-zero factor of 2 (to rid of the fractions within a fraction) I obtained my final general statement which provides answers that are consistently 2 times great than the true literature value that is found within the actual pattern.Is it correct to assume that it is not needed to write "2En® = bladabladada" as simply being able to simplify the fraction to the correct answer will suffice..? i.e. 12/8 simplified to 6/4 is the one I am wondering about. Am I fine by just putting En® = jhrgjq54tjhhg = then simplify the fractions to obtain the true value..? Or should I put a "divide by 2" sign after the general statement? Thank you ever so much. (: Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dessskris Posted December 3, 2011 Report Share Posted December 3, 2011 Hello there (: I wish I had found this thread earlier! I have obtained the general statement which provides me with correct answers but I just wanted to make sure : after having converted the general statement fraction with a non-zero factor of 2 (to rid of the fractions within a fraction) I obtained my final general statement which provides answers that are consistently 2 times great than the true literature value that is found within the actual pattern.Is it correct to assume that it is not needed to write "2En® = bladabladada" as simply being able to simplify the fraction to the correct answer will suffice..? i.e. 12/8 simplified to 6/4 is the one I am wondering about. Am I fine by just putting En® = jhrgjq54tjhhg = then simplify the fractions to obtain the true value..? Or should I put a "divide by 2" sign after the general statement? Thank you ever so much. (:I wondered about this too! but I'd put both fractions. one with the 0.something coefficients, and the simplified one with integer coefficients. good luck! 1 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahbenz Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 I have figured all the answers to this, however this is my first IA so i had some question formats if you guys don't mind helping me ! first of all, how long is this supposed to be ? How many pages do you have? Also, should i write an introduction? A page of content?thank you loads for the help! Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest UraBoat Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 http://www.ibsurviva...ps-and-queries/ 1 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxandchris Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 I've read through pages 1-8 of this thread (after that it seems to get off the topic I need, if not lemme know), and people are asking over and over of how to find the denominator and Desy is working hard to try and explain it. But I don't understand a lot of what you're saying. I've made three tables so far, r=1, r=2, r=3. And i have the rows in one column and the denominator in the other column. I can put this into the calculator and get three equations for each diagonal or slant. But how do i make this one equation for all three diagonals or all diagonals? And how do I put En® into the formula?And another question, for that actual portfolio, do I have to answer the questions in the order that they are? I know this is a kinda dumb question because they are already in the order I would use, but is it possible?I've read through pages 1-8 of this thread (after that it seems to get off the topic I need, if not lemme know), and people are asking over and over of how to find the denominator and Desy is working hard to try and explain it. But I don't understand a lot of what you're saying. I've made three tables so far, r=1, r=2, r=3. And i have the rows in one column and the denominator in the other column. I can put this into the calculator and get three equations for each diagonal or slant. But how do i make this one equation for all three diagonals or all diagonals? And how do I put En® into the formula?And another question, for that actual portfolio, do I have to answer the questions in the order that they are? I know this is a kinda dumb question because they are already in the order I would use, but is it possible? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxandchris Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 (edited) Okay I figured out the general statement finally, but how do I make the statement "for En®" I know how to use the n and r but how do I use the E. Is that the "y=" part?And at the end it says Explain how you arrived at your general statement after discussing the limitations, but I thought I was supposed to be explaining that the whole time while I was finding it. Do I need to summarize it or re-explain it at the end? Edited December 7, 2011 by maxandchris Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabs44 Posted December 8, 2011 Report Share Posted December 8, 2011 Okay I figured out the general statement finally, but how do I make the statement "for En®" I know how to use the n and r but how do I use the E. Is that the "y=" part?And at the end it says Explain how you arrived at your general statement after discussing the limitations, but I thought I was supposed to be explaining that the whole time while I was finding it. Do I need to summarize it or re-explain it at the end?You summarize and re-explain what you've done to get to your general statement (in words). Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dessskris Posted December 8, 2011 Report Share Posted December 8, 2011 I've read through pages 1-8 of this thread (after that it seems to get off the topic I need, if not lemme know), and people are asking over and over of how to find the denominator and Desy is working hard to try and explain it. But I don't understand a lot of what you're saying. I've made three tables so far, r=1, r=2, r=3. And i have the rows in one column and the denominator in the other column. I can put this into the calculator and get three equations for each diagonal or slant. But how do i make this one equation for all three diagonals or all diagonals? And how do I put En® into the formula?And another question, for that actual portfolio, do I have to answer the questions in the order that they are? I know this is a kinda dumb question because they are already in the order I would use, but is it possible?for each r, you create one GS in terms of n. and then you'll get something like:D=an2+bn+cbut with different coefficients/constants. now you are to generalise each of a,b,c. make an equation of each in terms of r.yes generally you do need to follow the order of questions in the task.Okay I figured out the general statement finally, but how do I make the statement "for En®" I know how to use the n and r but how do I use the E. Is that the "y=" part?And at the end it says Explain how you arrived at your general statement after discussing the limitations, but I thought I was supposed to be explaining that the whole time while I was finding it. Do I need to summarize it or re-explain it at the end?En( r) is basically just (equation of numerator)/(equation of denominator)yes throughout the working you need to explain your steps; and at the end just briefly summarise your method. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxandchris Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 I'm going to P.M you desy, but I need five posts first lol Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffree Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 Is it possible to do this task using matrices? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dessskris Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 Is it possible to do this task using matrices?yes Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
people12304 Posted December 11, 2011 Report Share Posted December 11, 2011 for r=5 to find a general statement is it linear regression because it says error with the quadratic regression Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Che Posted December 11, 2011 Report Share Posted December 11, 2011 I don't think r = 5 is needed at all. Up to r = 4 was enough for me to see the pattern. I would suggest you to do the same. Have you noticed the pattern? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urvashi Deshmukh Posted December 11, 2011 Report Share Posted December 11, 2011 Hi everyone,I am given the portfolio assignment and thankfully it isn't that hard. But, I have trouble explaining it. By looking at the numbers, I've noticed that the numerator increases by 1 than the previous number. What I meant is, in the 3rd row the numerator is 6 and it increases by four and becomes 10 in the next one. Then, 10 increases by five and becomes 15 in the 5th row. However, it seems to me that my explanation is sort of awkward. So I decided to ask you guys how you would explain it.I am attaching the portfolio method. Thanks in advance for your help! =)I've had this assignment too. For the general statement of the numerator and row number relationship I got a(n)=n(n+1) / 2 . I put it in the graphing calculator under STAT, and calculated the quad. regression.I dont understand how exactly the quadratic regression helped you get the general statement of the numerator and row relationship. I have the quadratic regression in the form of ax^2 + bx + c. Could you just please help me out here and tell me how to use this? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
people12304 Posted December 11, 2011 Report Share Posted December 11, 2011 Yes, I got the Gs for denominator but it does not work for r=5 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
people12304 Posted December 11, 2011 Report Share Posted December 11, 2011 Do i use the general statement En® to find the eight and ninth row for the question about finding additional rows? How many more additional rows are needed to find for the question? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bisen Posted December 12, 2011 Report Share Posted December 12, 2011 (edited) Post by: MahutaNo answers are allowed to be shared.---------------------------amidoinitrite? Edited December 16, 2011 by Mahuta ♥ Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.