Mahuta ♥ Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 (edited) So after moving around some titles, I settled on this one. I have some ideas, but I want to know if they're similar with those of you who are doing the same question, if any.My main point is that our approach to knowledge about the past is based on the presence of evidences. In another words, if you dont have evidencem there's nothing you can base your approach on, in which case, you wont have an approach. The approach will be limited by the use of perception(sensing something) and by the use of reason (logic).However, our approach to knowldge about the future doesnt require any evidence since it still didnt happen yet. We tend to use emotion(including intuition) and reason to approach it. This means that this approch isnt pending on any evidence, as in, the approach is more open than that of the knowledge of the past.Does this make sense to anyone? Edited January 14, 2009 by mahuta Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flsweetheart422 Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 There is already a thread for this one: http://www.ibsurvival.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=3227 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abu Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 Thanks flsweetheart422.Please search before you start a new topic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts