r1111 Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 So this question is about Paper 2. When writing a Paper 2 is it safe to assume the examiner has already read the text you are writing about and has studied in detail. The drama texts I am reading are fairly well known but nonetheless should I give lengthy descriptions of the context of the plot or not? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandwich Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Yes more or less, although you do still want to re-explain to an extent because it shows your knowledge of the text. Especially if you can drop in recurring themes, symbols and references which show depth of knowledge. You should always provide some context because of this and because you need context to truly elaborate your points, but you can refer to it rather than go "In this play, there are three men, the mens names are Bob, Sam and Harry, Bob is a tall man..." ETC! 2 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michigangurl Posted March 27, 2014 Report Share Posted March 27, 2014 Yes you do. If you summarize your work you lose major points. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackcurrant Posted March 27, 2014 Report Share Posted March 27, 2014 (edited) Wait a minute:If *all* you do is summarize then work, then you lose major points.And you certainly cannot expect to score in the higher echelons with "lengthy descriptions of context..." because none of this contributes to analysis or argument. And argument is what your response is all about. There is no need to "summarise at length" for examiners because your understanding and knowledge of the work will come across loud and clear as you build up your argument. Worried that examiners may mis-mark if you don't put them in the picture? Examiners can tell if you know the work really well from the detail of your explanations, even without having read the work itself. And it is unlikely that they will mark exams on works they are unfamiliar with. They can pick and choose exam papers from the electronic tray and will reject those based on works they do not know. Edited March 27, 2014 by Blackcurrant 2 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YellowSpider Posted March 28, 2014 Report Share Posted March 28, 2014 So this question is about Paper 2. When writing a Paper 2 is it safe to assume the examiner has already read the text you are writing about and has studied in detail. The drama texts I am reading are fairly well known but nonetheless should I give lengthy descriptions of the context of the plot or not? I think you'd have to contextualize a bit in your first paragraph. like blackcurrant said, don't overdo that, And don't do any interpretations as such. Understand the criteria before attempting past papers. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.