Jump to content

Gabyhdez

Recommended Posts

The danger with using Mythbusters as a Group 4 topic is that Mythbusters sometimes doesn't really follow your typical experimental design. For example, some myths they do are 'normal' - so they have a hypothesis like schrapnel from explosion is most deadly close to the detonation point, and they can test that. Others, such as what they do in more 'psychological' tests, aren't really as rigorous (not enough trials, too many variables - though to their credit they often repeat experiments with better controlled variables after they realise they screwed up), so not that great for IB.

However, Mythbusters is just generally awesome, and that awesomeness is more than enough to give you at least one good idea for a Group 4 project. Read away, and try not to get too distracted by all the awesome stuff on that wiki link above! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...