Award Winning Boss Posted January 14, 2012 Report Share Posted January 14, 2012 Sup people, I remember playing this game in an ICT lesson in school (boredom does crazy things to me) and i've forgotten the phrase/word that got two results so it is possible! so the aim of the game is to find a word/phrase that has the least number of results come up. The rules are: 1. It has to be use english words that can be found in the dictionary. 2. Don't press "i'm feeling lucky" (so chuck norris doesn't count ) 3. Use google 4. The phrase can only be 4 words maximum I'll go first (obviously ) "nihilistic rainbow" - 6.55 million results Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent1416 Posted January 14, 2012 Report Share Posted January 14, 2012 improper ratios physics applications: About 4,730,000 results Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Award Winning Boss Posted January 14, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2012 Does the phrase have to make sense? no but if people start breaking the internet then i'll change the rules. It has to make grammatical sense though "banal bananas eat rainbows" - 80, 100 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent1416 Posted January 14, 2012 Report Share Posted January 14, 2012 (edited) homo sapiens are philalethist: About 47 results Edited January 14, 2012 by anonymous1416 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabs44 Posted January 14, 2012 Report Share Posted January 14, 2012 "Reincarnation of Mongolian kings" - About 2 results Does getting 1 count as the theoretical best possible? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Award Winning Boss Posted January 14, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2012 "Reincarnation of Mongolian kings" - About 2 results Does getting 1 count as the theoretical best possible? When I searched that i got 1.6 million results Are you sure you read the number of results and not the time it took to get them? and yes 1 will win but when someone gets one that's under 10 i'll change it to 3 letters Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley Posted January 19, 2012 Report Share Posted January 19, 2012 (edited) "homogenic felis catus overlords" A bit tired, but it does give one result. One alleled cat overlords OR "multitudinous synthermal slubbered snyes" - 3 results with one omitted They are all words, some very obscure, several eqi-temperature stained small channels of water Problem is that all results for second one are virtually identical word lists. Edited January 19, 2012 by Bradley Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Austin Glau Posted February 2, 2012 Report Share Posted February 2, 2012 "pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosi floccinaucinihilipilification -longest -words" 3 results "i -i win -win" 0 results Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Positron Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 (edited) I got zero search results with this one:Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans with pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis.And all of those are actual words and it even makes sense. The first two words are the name of a certain type of bacteria, and the last one is the longest official word in the English language. It's a certain type of lung disease caused by the inhalation of very fine particles that erupted from a volcano.Here's the link for the google search:http://tinyurl.com/isthisaperfectscoreEdit: I didn't notice that this had sort-of-been posted here before... Edited February 8, 2012 by Positron Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.