Jump to content

IB Psychology HL Paper 2 and 3


Haasan Subàthasan

Recommended Posts

i did abnormal and sport psych, it was a really good paper, i think its because its a new syllabus so the essay questions were just the learning outcomes. you could pretty much predict what was going to be on it considering may 2011, they picked a learning outcome from every subheading. lol i just learnt three from one of them and they came up

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did abnormal and sport psych. For abnormal I knew there had to be at least one question on diagnosis, so that's all I studied.

Luckily the question was about evaluating research, so I just used all the studies I knew and evaluated them. The sport psych question I did was strange, it said outline techniques for skill development in sport and then discuss the techniques you have outlined.

But if you're going to discuss them then wouldn't you need to outline them anyway? I don't understand why they split the question like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did abnormal and sport psych. For abnormal I knew there had to be at least one question on diagnosis, so that's all I studied.

Luckily the question was about evaluating research, so I just used all the studies I knew and evaluated them. The sport psych question I did was strange, it said outline techniques for skill development in sport and then discuss the techniques you have outlined.

But if you're going to discuss them then wouldn't you need to outline them anyway? I don't understand why they split the question like that.

If you got a split question like that it should be because those are the two dot points that appear in the syllabus :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did abnormal and sport psych. For abnormal I knew there had to be at least one question on diagnosis, so that's all I studied.

Luckily the question was about evaluating research, so I just used all the studies I knew and evaluated them. The sport psych question I did was strange, it said outline techniques for skill development in sport and then discuss the techniques you have outlined.

But if you're going to discuss them then wouldn't you need to outline them anyway? I don't understand why they split the question like that.

If you got a split question like that it should be because those are the two dot points that appear in the syllabus :)

But it's not... the syllabus point says: Evaluate techniques for skill development in sport.

ah whatever, I guess the evaluate command term kinda covers it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...