Wernie Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 (edited) Hi guys! End-of-year promotion exams are coming up, and I'm getting very confused on how to go about doing evaluative questions (e.g. Evaluate the view that monopolies and harmful). He keeps going on about using "The Language of Economics". I don't doubt the need to use it, but if there are non-Econs points that I use, would it be alright to: 1) Talk/ Elaborate about the point and then 2) Talk about the impacts from an Econs viewpoint (with Econs lingo)? Any help/ input would be great. (: Thanks for reading. Edited September 25, 2010 by Wernie Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cynthia Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 What exactly do you mean by non-Econs points? Usually everything you have is in some way linked to Economics, but yes your approach sounds fine. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wernie Posted September 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2010 What exactly do you mean by non-Econs points? Usually everything you have is in some way linked to Economics, but yes your approach sounds fine.I guess what I meant by "non-Econs" points would be things that indirectly affect... the demand and supply of things, for example. But yeah, on hindsight, it was a silly distinction to make.. (: Thank you so much! Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.